31.2 C
New Delhi
Friday, July 31, 2026

Trump admin cannot refuse detained illegal immigrants a chance for release on bond, appeals court rules

Must read

James Y. Falcon
James Y. Falconhttps://scribbledpage.com
James Y. Falcon is a digital journalist and long-form content strategist covering global sports, entertainment, education, and trending world affairs. With a strong focus on search-driven news and audience behavior, his work blends real-time trend analysis with clear, contextual reporting. James specializes in breaking down fast-moving topics—ranging from international football and franchise cricket to exam updates and pop-culture shifts—into accurate, reader-friendly narratives. His articles are designed to help readers understand not just what is happening, but why it matters in a rapidly changing digital landscape. When not tracking global trends or analyzing search data, James focuses on refining long-form journalism for modern platforms, with an emphasis on clarity, credibility, and reader trust.

Get the latest developments right here.
This article covers the latest updates on Trump admin cannot refuse detained illegal immigrants a chance for release on bond, appeals court rules.
Aggregated from leading news outlets, this report provides the essential context.
Dive into the detailed report.

NEWYou can currentlylisten to The Channelarticles!

A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that the Trump administration cannot deny migrants detained inside the U.S. a chance for release on bond as part of its expanded mandatory detention policy.

In a 2-1 decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled against the administration.

Four other appeals courts have also rejected the policy, although the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans and Eighth Circuit in St. Louis have ruled in favor of the federal government.

The deepening circuit split raises the chance that the U.S. Supreme Court will eventually take up the case. The administration asked the high court last month to consider the case.

APPEALS COURT BLOCKS TRUMP ADMIN FROM HOLDING MIGRANTS WITHOUT BOND FOR 90 DAYS

Donald Trump and Markwayne Mullin

A federal appeals court ruled that the Trump administration cannot deny migrants detained inside the U.S. a chance for release on bond. (Jim WATSON / via Getty Images)

The Department of Homeland Security statedit “strongly disagrees with the Ninth Circuit panel and is confident in its legal position regarding mandatory detention.”

“President Donald Trump and Secretary Mullin are currentlyenforcing the law as it was actually written to keep America safe,” the department statedin a statement.

Under previous administrations, most illegal immigrants with no criminal record who were arrested inside the U.S. were allowed to seek a bond hearing while their immigration cases were pending, and mandatory detention was typically reserved for those detained at the border.

But last year, the administrationissued guidance expanding mandatory detention to include illegal immigrants inside the U.S. The move was part of the president’s mass deportation plan, leading to several lawsuits by immigrants pursuing a release from custody.

A U.S. Department Of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection sign is displayed at the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Headquarters on May 18, 2025 in Washington, DC.

The Department of Homeland Security statedit “strongly disagrees with the Ninth Circuit panel and is confident in its legal position regarding mandatory detention.” (Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

Some federal judges who ordered bond hearings criticized the administration for repeatedly violating their orders.

The administration has statedthat Congress changed immigration law in 1996 to allow mandatory detention past the border and that previous administrations failed to enforce that measure.

But Ninth Circuit Judge Daniel Bress, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, rejected that argument.

“Although no reading of the complicated and interrelated textual provisions at issue here is without some shortcomings, the historical understanding of the statute is the better one,” statedBress, writing for the majority.

DEMOCRAT COMPARES ICE TO ‘DOMESTIC TERRORISTS’ AS 111 HOUSE DEMS DEMAND TEXAS DETENTION CENTER CLOSE

ICE agents outside Delaney Hall

Some federal judges who ordered bond hearings criticized the administration for repeatedly violating their orders. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Bress was joined by Judge M. Margaret McKeown, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton.

Judge Carlos Bea, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, dissented, arguing that the amendment Congress passed 30 years ago supports the administration’s position.

The The News Wirecontributed to this report.

Disclaimer: This content is automatically syndicated from external news feeds for informational purposes.
The views held in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of this website.

Source: Click here to read the full original article

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest article